Gemini
THE CONTROLGreat if operational chores don’t bother you - every prompt, edit, and export by hand.
Free at the margin. You are the trigger, the memory, and the failure point.
THE GEMINI ALTERNATIVE FOR CONTENT TEAMS
'Free' counts the subscription. It doesn’t count the labor.
Free model, your own data, total control. The appeal is obvious - and so is the reason it rarely lasts. Here’s the honest math.
계산 보기 →THE HONEST CHOICE
'Full control' is another way of saying 'fully manual.'
Draftcamp
THE SYSTEMGreat when you want the editorial control that matters, without the operational toil.
Same final say. None of the manual machinery.
통제의 역설
The control that sells the DIY workflow is the same control that kills it
Every step you control is a step you have to perform - and one that stops the moment you’re busy.
01
THE TRADEOFF
Are you the trigger?
Does anything run the workflow besides you deciding to?
Gemini
Nothing runs unless you run it - happens exactly as often as you have spare bandwidth.
Draftcamp
Runs on signals, not bandwidth - the refreshes actually happen.
THE OTHER PATHS
'무료'가 실제로 드는 비용
DIY 워크플로우의 진짜 비용을 다시 계산하면, 가격표는 더 이상 흥미로운 숫자가 아니야.
EXPORTING, PROMPTING, REVIEWING, CMS WORK
The hours
Per article, every time - the labor 'free' doesn’t count
Best for: Understanding the real cost before comparing prices.
REFRESHES THAT NEVER HAPPEN
The lapses
The workflow stalls, and the cost of that silence is invisible until traffic drops
Best for: Seeing what free-and-manual actually risks.
A USEFUL FILTER
Is the sticker price the real cost, or is the labor?
PICK GEMINI WHEN
Free-and-yours matters to you, and you’re willing to count the hours as part of the real cost
PICK DRAFTCAMP WHEN
You’d rather price in the audit, the consistency, and the refreshes that actually happen
'Free' counts the subscription. It doesn’t count the labor - or the refreshes that never happen
DIY 워크플로우의 진짜 비용을 다시 계산하면, 가격표는 더 이상 흥미로운 숫자가 아니야.
WHAT A SYSTEM PRICES IN • DRAFTCAMP
- 감사가 고쳐야 할 점을 찾아내고 수작업 시간을 없애줘
- 일관된 파이프라인: 동일한 분류, 동일한 브랜드, 모든 기사에 적용
- 대역폭이 아닌 신호로 작동 - 리프레시가 실제로 이루어져
- 전체 라이브러리 보기 - 하락 전에 쇠퇴 포착
- 계산되지 않고 커지는 비용 대신 고정된, 명확한 비용
WHAT 'FREE' ACTUALLY COSTS • GEMINI + SEARCH CONSOLE
- 시간: GSC 내보내기, 프롬프트 작성, 검토, CMS 작업 - 기사마다, 매번
- 발견: 300개 기사 중 어느 걸 볼지 수동으로 결정하기
- 일관성 부족: 사람마다 다른 프롬프트, 다른 톤, 다른 품질
- 누락: 워크플로우가 멈춰서 실제로 안 되는 리프레시들
- The blindness: no view of what’s decaying, so problems surface as traffic drops
STILL DECIDING?